Twitter Shuts Down Anonymous Accounts for Harassing ISIS

by  AnonWatcher

In a bizarre turn of events, Twitter is shutting down Anonymous accounts for harassing ISIS. The likelihood of being shut down is in response to complaints being made, according to the Independent. @support ISIS GNOME BACK LOL @228Buraaminkum #targets #ghostsec #opisis — Phobos_Anonymous (@Yabadabado_3) February 25, 2016

Up to 125,000 ISIS accounts have so far been shut down on Twitter alone, with Anonymous affiliated accounts claiming for half of those. Since the social media battle was waged on ISIS accounts, Anonymous supporters have assisted in finding and reporting the terrorism related accounts to help stem the terror recruiting that has happened online. But as a response this week, it has been reported that Anonymous affiliated accounts are also being closed down, one by one, with some of the larger #OpISIS supporters silenced.


Read more:

Twitter Shuts Down Anonymous Accounts for Harassing ISIS

Peter Strzok didn’t work alone


Peter Strzok

The main stream media is focusing on the details of his anti-Trump expressions, when the messages between Peter Strzok and his mistress and an FBI lawyer Lisa Page are under consideration. But there are more important issues we should find in headlines.

This video (0.00 – 5.00) shows how one individual exercise decisive influence over all the most important current FBI investigations. The epicenter of investigations, such as Clinton server investigation and the Trump- Russia investigation is Peter Strzok. He is  a Deputy Assistant Director of the (FBI), and second in command of counterintelligence. He also has reportedly served as chief of counterintelligence at the FBI.


JORDAN: And he’s the same Peter Strzok who was a key player in the Clinton investigation, the same Peter Strzok who interviewed Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, participated in the Clinton — Secretary Clinton’s interview? And he’s also the same Peter Strzok who — now we know — changed Director Comey’s exoneration letter, changed the term “gross negligence,” which is a crime, to “extreme carelessness”? Is that the same guy?


WRAY: Well, Congressman, I don’t know every step that the individual you mentioned was involved in. But certainly, I know that he was heavily involved in the Clinton e-mail investigation.


JORDAN: And he — thank you. And he — and is it — is this the same Peter Strzok who helped — was a key player in the Russian investigation, and the same Peter Strzok who was put on Mueller’s team — Special Counsel Bob Mueller’s team?


WRAY: I certainly know that he was working on the special counsel’s investigation. Whether or not he would be characterized as…


JORDAN: And the same…


WRAY: … a key player on that investigation, that’s really not for me to say.


JORDAN: … OK — and the same Peter Strzok that, we learned this past weekend, was removed from the special counsel team because he exchanged text messages with a colleague at the FBI that were — displayed a pro-Clinton bias — is that accurate?


WRAY: Yes.

There is nothing in the FBI guidelines that prevents agents from having or expressing a political opinion in their capacity as an individual, even publicly.  But if this affected his work, then every outcome of the investigation he was involved in comes into question.

The Steele Dossier

Agent Strzok was also reported as the FBI contact person to receive the Russian Dossier and interview the author Christopher Steele.

Political campaigns usually try to dig up dirt on their opponent if they can. That is what Fusion GPS tried to deliver. Clinton campaign and DNC  paid for Fusion GPS via a law firm.

(Notice Jim Jordan saying: “. The Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign –which we now know were one in the same…”)

The cash went from Fusion to British ex-spy Christopher Steele. He then paid Kremlin sources for supposed dirt on the Trump team. His dossier a collection of more or less unverified allegations of collusion between President Donald Trump’s team and Russia, denied by those involved.

The big question is whether the bureau used the Steele dossier to obtain a FISA warrant for spying on members of the Trump team.

JORDAN: Well, here’s what I’m not getting: Peter Strzok is selected to be on Mueller’s team, after all this history, put on Mueller’s team, and then he’s removed for some pro-Clinton text messages. I mean, there are all kinds of people on Mueller’s team who are pro-Clinton. There’s been all kinds of stories — PolitiFact reported 96 percent of the top lawyers’ contributions went to Clinton or Obama.

But Peter Strzok, the guy who ran the Clinton investigation; interviewed Mills, Abedin; interviewed Secretary Clinton; changed “gross negligence,” a crime, to the term “extreme carelessness;” who ran the Russian investigation; who interviewed Mike Flynn gets put on Mueller’s team, and then he gets kicked off for a text message that’s anti-Trump.

If you kicked everybody off Mueller’s team who was anti-Trump, I don’t think there’d be anybody left. So here — there’s got to be something more here. It can’t just be some text messages that show a pro-Clinton, anti-Trump bias. There’s got to be something more. And I’m trying to figure out what it is.

But my hunch is it has something to do with the dossier. Director, did Peter Strzok help produce and present the application to the FISA court to secure a warrant to spy on Americans associated with the Trump campaign?


CHRISTOPHER WRAY, FBI: I’m not prepared to discuss anything about a FISA process in this setting.

JORDAN: We’re not talking about what happened in the court, we’re talking about what the FBI took to the court. The application. Was Peter Strzok involved in taking that to the court?

WRAY: I’m not going to discuss anything to do with the FISA court applications.

JORDAN: Remember a couple things, director… about the dossier. The Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign –which we now know were one in the same– paid the law firm, who paid Fusion GPS, who paid Christopher Steele, who then paid Russians to put together a report we call the dossier, filled with all kinds of fake news National Enquirer garbage.
It is been reported that this dossier was all dressed up by the FBI, taken to the FISA court and presented as a legitimate intelligence document — that it became the basis for granting a warrant to spy on Americans. I am wondering if that actually took place. It sure looks like it did.

“I think Peter Strzok, head of counterintelligence at the FBI… Peter Strzok, the guy who ran the FBI’s Clinton investigation, did all the interviews… Peter Strzok, the guy who was running the Russia investigation at the FBI… Peter Strzok, Mr. Super Agent at the FBI, I think he is the guy that took the application to the FISA court.

“And if this happened, if you have the FBI working with the Democrats’ campaign, to take opposition research, dress it all up and turning it into an intelligence document to take it to a FISA court so they can spy on another campaign, if that happened, that is as wrong as it gets..


Peter Strzok didn’t work alone

There is over  35000 employees and  Peter Strzok is running everything? The headlines appear entirely shaped to make him the scapegoat.

Peter Strzok wrote to Lisa Page, dated Aug. 15, 2016:

I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk

It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40,

Was Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe involved in this conservation? Had FBI secret ‘insurance policy’ in case Trump won?

People’s Comments:

  • Trump wasn’ t supposed to win so they never thought any accountability would be necessary.
  • How does Congress provide oversight if federal agencies refuse to provide documents to them without any kind of penalties?
  • If you want to politically destroy the President, the FBI only needs to accuse [President] of a crime and start investigating that crime. If said President fires the FBI agent, a special prosecutor is appointed to search and destroy the President and any and all of the President’s men.
  • No FBI or DOJ members can be fired by the President while they are investigating the President. Well if I were in the FBI and in hot water, I’d begin investigating the President thus securing my job or at least enable revenge taking at some point, after being fired…..
  • This whole crisis is because we elected a president who isn’t “one of them”.
  • One logical conclusion to make is that a coup has already taken place (1963?), and Trump is the counter coup.



How ex-spy Christopher Steele compiled his explosive Trump-Russia dossier

FBI agents had secret ‘insurance policy’ in case Trump won


Einstein was a very wise man


Einstein is famous for his exceptional skills in theoretical physics and mathematics . Recently i have seen so many memes of his views on politics and society, that I wanted to check up, if they are real.
They are. I could learn that Einstein was so engaged with politics, that the FBI had him under surveillance and compiled a 2000-page secret file on his political activities. There were many people in 1949 who already understood that capitalism is incompatible with democracy : Wealth and power is concentrated in the hands of a few and the elites form an oligarchy who can infuence politicians to work in their favor.
But most people didn’t realize, and there are still people, who don’t realize the importance of media. We have no chance to keep our individual human rights, if all information we get is biased and censored by people who have the political and economic power.

Here are some excerpts from his essay “Why Socialism?” published in the May 1949 issue of the magazine “Monthly Review”:

Man can find meaning in life, short and perilous as it is, only through devoting himself to society.
The economic anarchy of capitalist society as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of the evil.


The essential point about this process is the relation between what the worker produces and what he is paid, both measured in terms of real value. Insofar as the labor contract is “free,” what the worker receives is determined not by the real value of the goods he produces, but by his minimum needs and by the capitalists’ requirements for labor power in relation to the number of workers competing for jobs. It is important to understand that even in theory the payment of the worker is not determined by the value of his product.


Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones. The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society.
This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature. The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population.
Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education). It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights.


Albert Einstein Has a Social Media Team How the famed physicist tweets from beyond the grave

Why Einstein Was a Genius

Why the FBI Kept a 1,400-Page File on Einstein






















































































































































































































The Rape statistics in Sweden

Headlines like “Sweden is the rape capital of the world” are fake news. For several reasons:



The sexual act can be intercourse, but also other sexual acts because of coercion or other circumstances are serious offensive can lead to a person convicted of  rape. Anyone who exploits someone who is asleep, unconscious, drunk or under the influence of another drug, mentally disturbed, sick or otherwise is in a particularly vulnerable situation, can also be convicted of rape.

The rape and sexual assault laws of Sweden are very broad. But the case with several years of preliminary investigation (never even charges)  because of a condom failure is unique.

But  the case Julian Assange is not about the crime investigation. It is Swedish foreign policy to get him to Sweden in chains and be handed over to the United States. The rape law was  even modified to fit  Assange case. Anyway, it gives a hint, what can be recorded as a rape in Sweden.
Prosecutor Marianne Ny is just embarrassing the Swedish legal system
by Lynn Prentice:

“They (the women) are not jurists”. You need a law degree to know whether you have been raped or not in Sweden. In the context of such double think, the question of how the Swedish authorities propose to deal with victims who neither saw themselves as such nor acted as such is easily answered: You’re not a Swedish lawyer so you wouldn’t understand anyway. The consent of both women to sex with Assange has been confirmed by prosecutors.

Counting rules

Unlike the majority of countries in Europe, crime data in Sweden are collected when the offence in question is first reported, at which point the classification may be unclear.
Each case of sexual violence is recorded as a separate incident in Sweden. If a woman says she has been raped by her husband every day during a month, the Swedish police may record more than 30 cases of rape. In many other countries only a single offence would be counted in such a situation

Reporting rates by victims

Willingness to report crime also affects the statistics. In countries where rape remains associated with a strong taboo and a high level of shame, women have to be brave to report such offences. In a country with higher level of  gender equality women  have increasingly been encouraged to report sexual assaults or rapes.

In a country, in which a police force and justice system enjoy a high level of confidence and a good reputation with the public, the crime reporting rate is higher compared with a justice system which is distrusted as ineffective or unfair.

The summary of all written above: I bet Sweden is number one in statistics to report rape and other sexual crimes.

Wikipedia: Rape in Sweden

The Indicter Magazine

A monthly magazine on human rights & geopolitical issues published by Libertarian Books – Sweden/Italy. Editor-in-chief Professor Marcello Ferrada de Noli.

Gender Equality Awareness Raising against Intimate Partner Violence 





That September 11, when U.S. decided yet another regime-change. A personal testimony – THE INDICTER


by Marcello Ferrada de Noli.

“Today, 11 of September, we sadly commemorate a new anniversary of the U.S. backed military coup that deposed and killed the democratic elected Chilean President Salvador Allende, with the purpose of changing a democratic regime and install the fascist rule of General Augusto Pinochet. We also pay homage in this day to the heroic resistance commenced that day by the Movimiento de Izquierda Revolucionaria, MIR. While hundreds of MIR combatants were killed, others were captured in the aftermath of our military defeat in confronting the U.S. backed powerful armed forces of Pinochet. The bloody coup left thousands of deaths, perished in combat or killed by execution squads or assassinated during torture.”

“…I was taken first to the Stadium in Concepción. The morning after I was lined with two other prisoners waiting execution – right under the goal frame – by firing squad….”


Source: That September 11, when U.S. decided yet another regime-change. A personal testimony – THE INDICTER


Who is  Marcello Ferrada de Noli?




Main current research fields

-Transcultural Psychiatry  and Psychiatric Epidemiology
-Posttraumatic stress etiology
-Psychosocial determinants in Injury Epidemiology
-Psychiatric Epidemiology in natural catastrophes
-Suicidal behaviour and self-inflicted injury
-Cross-cultural Epidemiology / International Public Health




The criminal investigation of the Awan brothers – MSM silent

FBI Seized Smashed Hard Drives From Wasserman Schultz IT Aide’s Home”

“Imran Awan arrested”

“External server to which House data was being funneled”

“Arrested Awan Brother Tries to Influence DHS Answers to Trey Gowdy’s Questions”

“DC Detective of Seth Rich Murder: Follow the Awan Arrest Closely”

Nothing to see here ? The main stream media is silent, or only mention the arrest of Imran Awan’s arrest in parentes.

“The brothers, Imran Awan in particular, had access to a variety of files and classified data that no citizen let alone a foreign agent provocateur should ever have had access too.”

MSM Completely Ignoring Imran Awan Arrest Distracting with Transgender Narrative

Imran Awan was arrested  last Monday when he tried to leave the country. Main stream media has been silent about the investigation of  of Awan brothers but Luke Rosiak have of list of articles including some court documents.Wasserman Schultz’s brother, Steven Wasserman, is the Assistant US Attorney at the Attorney’s office for the District of Columbia. He is involved in this investigation according some sources

“Chiefs of staff for dozens of Democratic lawmakers who employed the four were informed last week that a criminal probe was underway into their use of congressional information technology systems, including the existence of an external server to which House data was being funneled, and into the theft of and overbilling for computer equipment.”


This is a pure conspiracy theory. I don’t know  how  the Awan brothers look like, because  there are a cricket player and professor and others with the same name, except those  Awan on House payrolls. There seems to be a confusion in media. In spite of that, this guy’s behavior is odd. He is not one of the Trey Gowdy’s official staff, anyway.


Trey Gowdy grills Ex DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson – Russian Interference in 2016 Election 


Here I found the same pattern with another nervous witness!   


Trey Gowdy scares the hell out of Brennan by insinuating he unmasked name(s) on his last working day.


DC Detective of Seth Rich Murder: Follow the Awan Arrest Closely – Connect the Dots to “Other” Cases!


Is Debbie Wasserman Schultz Obstructing Justice In Awan Brothers Investigation?



SOHR – The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights

“Syrian Observatory for Human rights is a UK-based organization providing data to the Western press about troop movements, government policy and public sentiment in Syria.”

It is important for any organisation that claims to observe human rights in any country to be independent and unbiased.

But you could not imagine a more unreliable, compromised and biased source of information than SOHR. It is essentially one man – Abdul Rahman, aka Rami Abdulrahman, aka Osama Suleiman – a three-term convicted criminal from Syria. He is a member of the Syrian opposition, who want to overthrow Bashar Al Assad. and is only  reporting  the ‘civil war’ from the perspective of the so-called rebels. He had not been to Syria since 2000, and is living in a small house in Coventry, England.  He must have pretty good observation skills, considering Syria is 3000 miles away.  Mostly he is busy at his clothing shop that he runs with his wife.

SOHR is often the only source of information used by Western politicians and media to justify a foreign backed insurgency in Syria. The UN has also used this propaganda  in several of its reports.

The New York Times also revealed 2013 for the first time that Abdul Rahman’s operation is indeed funded by the European Union and a “European country” he refuses to identify.

“Western intelligence agencies set up the armed opposition/terrorist proxy forces in Syria, so they would obviously want to control the media narrative about what happens there. Rahman does his part by vacuuming up information reported by those same proxy forces. This information is then given out to the Western media with SOHR as source.

In August 2011, Electronic Intifada editor Ali Abunimah investigated claims circulating on the Internet that newborn babies in a Hama hospital had been deliberately killed after their incubators were switched off by regime forces during a military crackdown on the city. Electronic Intifada concluded that the claims were a “hoax” circulated by CNN. A photo accompanying the claim on Twitter turned out to be of Egyptian babies, and was taken from an April story about overcrowding in an Egyptian hospital.

While CNN cited the Observatory as their source for the report, on their website the Observatory in turn cited CNN as its source.
“To me the story was immediately suspicious. First of all it sounded too much like the false reports of invading Iraqi troops throwing babies out of incubators in Kuwait in August 1990 — reports that were used to build public support and urgency for the 1991 Gulf War. These claims were part of an elaborate propaganda effort by the Washington PR consultancy Hill & Knowlton hired by the Kuwaiti government.”

“The picture circulating with many of the alarmist report of dozens of dead babies in Syria, you will be glad to know, shows a bunch of babies who are alive, hopefully well, and living in Egypt.But those who originate such claims — and embellish them with false details and pictures — know, as the fraudsters who fabricated similar stories from Kuwait, that atrocities committed against children are guaranteed to inflame people’s emotions. Perhaps that is the goal, and to what purpose only the perpetrators know.”

How CNN helped spread a hoax about Syrian babies dying in incubators